|this pic and article HERE|
"In a recent content analysis of three leading girls’ magazines, aimed at girls aged 5-12, approximately half the content was considered sexualized in two of the magazines. In the case of the third magazine, 75% of content was considered sexualized, whilst merely one fifth of that magazine was “developmentally appropriate for the target audience” (Rush & La Nauze, 2006, p. 16). With regards to advertisements, Rush and La Nauze differentiate between ‘Child-selling-to-child’ advertisements (CC ads) and ‘Child-selling-to-adult’ advertisements (CA ads), “the implicitly paedophilic connotations” of which seem “even more disturbing” (Rush & La Nauze, 2006, p. 11). However, it is the premature sexualization of children that is the major concern here, not just sexualised advertising. It is feared that children are being ‘groomed’ for paedophiles: (see also Singer et al., 2007, p. 35). In the case of girls’ magazines, girls of primary school age are actively encouraged to have crushes on adult male celebrities. The risk is that when these girls fantasize “about dating adult men, they will be more inclined to see adult sexual advances as flattering” (Rush & La Nauze, 2006, p.21)."
|condoms for kids|
|porn where's your head|
|can we at least have some cigars??|
The 2-year-old child was photographed on a beach with his parents where the family was trying to enjoy some private time. Someone who was long on lens, but who is short on decency, and greedy as all get out, thought it was a good idea to